Jurors in Trump hush money trial end 1st day of deliberations after asking to rehear testimony

NEW YORK (AP) — The jury in Donald Trump’s hush money trial ended its first day of deliberations without a verdict Wednesday but asked to rehear testimony from key witnesses about the alleged hush money scheme at the heart of the history-making case.
The 12-person jury was sent home around 4 p.m. after about 4 1/2 hours of deliberations. The process is to resume Thursday, when jurors are expected to rehear the requested testimony and at least part of the judge’s legal instructions meant to guide them on the law.

Th e notes sent to the judge with the requests were the first burst of communication with the court after the panel of seven men and five women was sent to a private room just before 11:30 a.m. to begin weighing a verdict.

“It is not my responsibility to judge the evidence here. It is yours,” Judge Juan M. Merchan told jurors before dispatching them to begin deliberations, reminding them of their vow during the selection process to judge the case fairly and impartially.

It’s unclear how long the deliberations will last. A guilty verdict would deliver a stunning legal reckoning for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee as he seeks to reclaim the White House while an an acquittal would represent a major win for Trump and embolden him on the campaign trail. Since verdicts must be unanimous, it’s also possible that the case ends in a mistrial if the jury cannot reach a consensus after days of deliberations.

Trump struck a pessimistic tone after leaving the courtroom following the reading of jury instructions, repeating his assertions of a “very unfair trial” and saying: “Mother Teresa could not beat those charges, but we’ll see. We’ll see how we do.”

He remained inside the courthouse during deliberations, where he posted on his social media network complaints about the trial and quoted legal and political commentators who view the case in his favor. In one all-capital-letters post, he proclaimed that he didn’t even “know what the charges are in this rigged case,” even though he was present in the courtroom as the judge detailed them to jurors.

Related Posts

Fetterman Slams Dems Again Over Govt. Shutdown Talk: ‘Total Theater’

Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman lashed out at fellow Senate Democrats for risking a partial government shutdown on Thursday morning. In a post on X, Fetterman dismissed their…

House Passes Bill Blocking Future Presidents From Banning Oil Drilling Without Congress’ Approval

Legislation was passed 226 to 188 by the Republican-controlled House to prevent future administrations from prohibiting oil and gas drilling without the consent of Congress. The “Protecting…

Asthma can be fatal: Remembering Ryan Gibbons

Asthma and every attack have the potential to be life-threatening. The sudden and tragic death of 12-year-old Ryan Gibbons is a stark reminder of that. Ryan was an energetic boy…

Obama discussed the challenges she faces during bedtime with her husband

This week, former First Lady Michelle Obama attracted attention once more by disclosing personal insights about her life and routines.In an interview on “Not Gonna Lie with…

I HID MY FACE FOR YEARS—UNTIL THE DAY THEY HANDED ME THAT MEDAL

I used to stare at the bathroom mirror and not recognize the guy looking back. After the blast, everything changed—my face, my voice, the way strangers looked…

Trump Signs Order Restoring Monuments Removed During Biden Presidenc

The age of wokeness is over, and President Donald Trump is at the helm, dismantling remnants of its history-destroying reign of terror. On Thursday, the president ordered…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *