Jurors in Trump hush money trial end 1st day of deliberations after asking to rehear testimony

NEW YORK (AP) — The jury in Donald Trump’s hush money trial ended its first day of deliberations without a verdict Wednesday but asked to rehear testimony from key witnesses about the alleged hush money scheme at the heart of the history-making case.
The 12-person jury was sent home around 4 p.m. after about 4 1/2 hours of deliberations. The process is to resume Thursday, when jurors are expected to rehear the requested testimony and at least part of the judge’s legal instructions meant to guide them on the law.

Th e notes sent to the judge with the requests were the first burst of communication with the court after the panel of seven men and five women was sent to a private room just before 11:30 a.m. to begin weighing a verdict.

“It is not my responsibility to judge the evidence here. It is yours,” Judge Juan M. Merchan told jurors before dispatching them to begin deliberations, reminding them of their vow during the selection process to judge the case fairly and impartially.

It’s unclear how long the deliberations will last. A guilty verdict would deliver a stunning legal reckoning for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee as he seeks to reclaim the White House while an an acquittal would represent a major win for Trump and embolden him on the campaign trail. Since verdicts must be unanimous, it’s also possible that the case ends in a mistrial if the jury cannot reach a consensus after days of deliberations.

Trump struck a pessimistic tone after leaving the courtroom following the reading of jury instructions, repeating his assertions of a “very unfair trial” and saying: “Mother Teresa could not beat those charges, but we’ll see. We’ll see how we do.”

He remained inside the courthouse during deliberations, where he posted on his social media network complaints about the trial and quoted legal and political commentators who view the case in his favor. In one all-capital-letters post, he proclaimed that he didn’t even “know what the charges are in this rigged case,” even though he was present in the courtroom as the judge detailed them to jurors.

Related Posts

Electrical Safety at Home: Why Proper Charger Use Matters More Than You Think

Chargers have become a constant part of everyday life, keeping phones, tablets, and laptops powered throughout the day. Despite how routine they seem, using them carelessly can…

This is the silent disease that is triggered when you come into contact with …

If you notice your legs are swollen, that’s a sign of ca…

Swollen legs are a common concern among older adults, often leading to discomfort and limited mobility. While occasional puffiness can be harmless, frequent or persistent swelling shouldn’t…

I am 87 years old: if you cannot live alone, before going to a care home, consider these alternatives.

At 87, I’ve learned something I wish more people knew: when living alone becomes difficult, moving into a care home isn’t the only option. Many people assume…

Understanding a Common Body Response and Its Role in Urinary Health

The urge to urinate after intimacy is a natural protective response built into the body. During and after sexual activity, changes such as increased blood flow, relaxed…

What’s Behind the Rash on Donald Trump’s Neck – His Doctor Breaks Silence

A recent public appearance by Donald Trump drew widespread attention after observers noticed a visible mark on his neck during a formal ceremony in Washington, D.C. The…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *